<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Do Lawsuits Cost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/</link>
	<description>Legal news and tips for employees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Antonio Employment Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>San Antonio Employment Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Length and Cost of a Lawsuit...&lt;/strong&gt;

My friend Gene Lee wrote a good post about how long discrimination lawsuits can take. He refers to statistics showing that from start to finish, the average lawsuit will take 22 months. That sounds about right for the San......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Length and Cost of a Lawsuit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>My friend Gene Lee wrote a good post about how long discrimination lawsuits can take. He refers to statistics showing that from start to finish, the average lawsuit will take 22 months. That sounds about right for the San&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Tom, I couldn&#039;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>Tom, I couldn&#039;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Tom, I couldn&#039;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I had a case where the defendant filed 37 affirmative defenses. Just before trial, all but 1 defense was dismissed. All the time spent by the parties trying to prove/disprove the 36 other defenses was wasted. Maybe you and I should start a website devoted to frivolous defenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Crane</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>&quot;frivolous&quot; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &quot;dabble&quot; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  

More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;frivolous&#8221; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &#8220;dabble&#8221; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  </p>
<p>More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Crane</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>&quot;frivolous&quot; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &quot;dabble&quot; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  

More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;frivolous&#8221; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &#8220;dabble&#8221; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  </p>
<p>More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Crane</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>&quot;frivolous&quot; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &quot;dabble&quot; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  

More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;frivolous&#8221; lawsuits do exist, but generally not in the employment area.  As Gene points out, they are too expensive and risky to file without a strong factual basis.  BUT, some lawyers do &#8220;dabble&#8221; in employment law and file suits that are more based on lack of fairness than on actual violation of some law.  </p>
<p>More common IMO are frivolous defenses.  Defense attorneys routinely lodge pointless defenses that cannot possibly pertain to a particular lawsuit.   Some defense attorneys not all, but some then will file weak or frivolous motions for summary judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-457</guid>
		<description>i would simply add, what your comment implies:  that a plaintiff who wants to bring a questionable lawsuit would not be able to retain an attorney to take the case on a contingency basis and would have to pay his/her attorney  hourly fees (on a current basis), likely to equal or exceed the $10,000 hard costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would simply add, what your comment implies:  that a plaintiff who wants to bring a questionable lawsuit would not be able to retain an attorney to take the case on a contingency basis and would have to pay his/her attorney  hourly fees (on a current basis), likely to equal or exceed the $10,000 hard costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>i would simply add, what your comment implies:  that a plaintiff who wants to bring a questionable lawsuit would not be able to retain an attorney to take the case on a contingency basis and would have to pay his/her attorney  hourly fees (on a current basis), likely to equal or exceed the $10,000 hard costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would simply add, what your comment implies:  that a plaintiff who wants to bring a questionable lawsuit would not be able to retain an attorney to take the case on a contingency basis and would have to pay his/her attorney  hourly fees (on a current basis), likely to equal or exceed the $10,000 hard costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weidmann Law</title>
		<link>http://www.CALaborLaw.com/2008/09/26/how-much-do-lawsuits-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Weidmann Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.CALaborLaw.com/?p=198#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the referral link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the referral link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

