Legal news and tips for employees, by Law Office of Eugene Lee

California Judges Getting $46,000 a Year “Perks” from Counties: Is This OK?

Imagine you are suing someone. Imagine you and the defendant are before a judge. Imagine that judge happens to be receiving $46,000 per year in "perks" and "supplemental benefits" from your opponent that you don’t know about. Would you have doubts about how fair this judge can be to you? Do you have a right to be told about these "perks" and "supplemental benefits" beforehand?

The Associated Press reports in an article entitled "California judges aren’t sharing state’s economic pain" , that California superior court judges, the kind of judges most employees would come before in most employment lawsuits, receive perks and supplemental benefits of up to $46,000 per year from county governments. That is on top of their $179,000 state salaries. In 2008, a California Court of Appeal overturned a superior court judge in finding that Los Angeles County’s payments to judges of $21 million per year in perks and supplemental benefits were a violation of the California constitution. The case, Harold P. Sturgeon v. The County of Los Angeles, Fourth App. Dist. Div. One, Case No. D050832 , was filed by Judicial Watch , a conservative watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. After the ruling came down, the California Judges Association responded by successfully lobbying Sacramento to keep the perks in place through legislation (S.B. 11 ) that was signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger on February 20, 2009.

What does all this mean for you?

If you happen to work for a county government entity and you decide to take them to superior court, watch out. You will be appearing before a judge whose health club membership or health insurance is being paid for by that very same county employer you are suing. How fair can you expect this judge to be to you? In my experience, expect the worst.

If you’re a taxpayer in California, it means that up to $25 mil. per year of your tax money is being paid to judges in the form of perks, above and beyond their state income, that are unconstitutional.

These County paid perks undermine all notions of justice, particularly considering how often County entities appear as litigants in court.

What is to be done?

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedin

3 Responses to California Judges Getting $46,000 a Year “Perks” from Counties: Is This OK?

Leave a reply

Law Office of Eugene Lee
555 W 5th St, Ste 3100
Los Angeles, CA

Law Office of Eugene Lee
6 Centerpointe Dr, Ste 700
La Palma, CA 90623

T: (213) 992-3299
F: (213) 596-0487

Disclaimer: This website is an advertisement. The information and material contained in this website are for general informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be used or relied on as such. Any liability that might arise from any use or reliance on the contents of this site is expressly disclaimed. Your use of such contents does not create an attorney-client relationship – only an express signed agreement can do that. The content of any communication you send to us via the Internet or through e-mail may not be considered confidential. Eugene D. Lee is licensed to practice law in the States of New York and California only.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. You are free to Share — to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under the following conditions: 1. Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). 2. Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. 3. No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.