Legal news and tips for employees, by Law Office of Eugene Lee

LAPD Hit with $2.3 Mil. Sexual Harassment Jury Verdict

The LA Times reports in an article entitled “Jury awards $2.3 million in LAPD harassment case” that a federal jury has awarded a female police officer $2.3 million for sexual harassment and retaliation by members of the Los Angeles Police Department’s Valley Traffic Division in 1996. Melissa Borck, et al., v. City of Los Angeles, et al. (Case No. CV 99-11575-TJH(Ex)) was tried before U.S. District Judge Terry J. Hatter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Some highlights:

  1. Officer Melissa Borck, 45, alleged that a male officer pushed her head to his groin and said, “I thought you’d never ask” and that female officers were ordered to pick up dry cleaning, lunch or coffee for male officers.
  2. Borck alleged that the harassment had caused her to give birth to a stillborn baby only 19 weeks into her pregnancy.
  3. Borck continues to work for the LAPD and says she and fellow female officers continue to face harassment and retaliation from the LAPD
  4. The award comprised $1 million economic damages (e.g., lost wages, medical bills) and $1.3 million in non-economic damages (primarily emotional distress).
  5. The case was tried twice. Borck lost the first trial but U.S. District Judge Terry Hatter declared a mistrial when a juror was heard saying after the verdict, “We weren’t here to hear about her dead baby”.
  6. A few months ago, in November 2008, the LAPD had settled another sexual harassment lawsuit for $2.25 million.
  7. The City of Los Angeles is deciding whether to appeal.

My main takeaway: the emotional distress award of $1.3 million in particular is large, showing that juries continue to give plaintiffs substantial awards when justice requires it, even amidst a severe economic recession. This verdict should add fuel to the growing debate over whether severe recessionary conditions are causing juries to become more anti-plaintiff or anti-defendant.

Congratulations to attorney Matthew McNicholas for coming back from a loss to obtain justice for Officer Borck.

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedin

5 Responses to LAPD Hit with $2.3 Mil. Sexual Harassment Jury Verdict

  1. WAY TO GO MELISSA!!!. I know there are some great police officers out there, but it’s the idiots who abuse their power (the power in their own minds) that make it hard to trust a cop!!!!!!. Again WAY TO GO MELISSA, u fought hard and long against a “mans” world . But u proved ur right,, L.A.P.D. needs to take a long hard look at some of these officers and “clean” their house!!!! Maybe if they did physcological (sp) testing BEFORE they were allowed to become cops , these type of things would not happen… But if they did test them then it’s time for L.A.P.D. to get a NEW DR. who doing the tests.” Way To go Girl U Rock!!!! ,

Leave a reply

Law Office of Eugene Lee
555 W 5th St, Ste 3100
Los Angeles, CA

Law Office of Eugene Lee
6 Centerpointe Dr, Ste 700
La Palma, CA 90623

T: (213) 992-3299
F: (213) 596-0487

Disclaimer: This website is an advertisement. The information and material contained in this website are for general informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be used or relied on as such. Any liability that might arise from any use or reliance on the contents of this site is expressly disclaimed. Your use of such contents does not create an attorney-client relationship – only an express signed agreement can do that. The content of any communication you send to us via the Internet or through e-mail may not be considered confidential. Eugene D. Lee is licensed to practice law in the States of New York and California only.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. You are free to Share — to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under the following conditions: 1. Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). 2. Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. 3. No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.